9th Circuit Revives Class Action Over ‘Zombie’ Smartphone Cookies – Courthouse News Service

SAN FRANCISCO (CN) Verizon customers who accused an online ad company of using zombie cookies to collect personal data through their smartphones will have a second chance to sue the company as a class, the Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday.

A three-judge appeals panel granted the subscribers petition to overturn a federal judges order staying theirproposedclass action and compelling arbitration between the lead plaintiff and Verizon over Turn Inc.s alleged conduct, ruling that the lower court had committed clear error.

We are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed, the per curiam opinion said.

A class of Verizon customers from New York sued Turn in the Northern District of California in 2015, claiming the company used zombie cookies to monitor their online behavior through their mobile devices.

Advertisers use bits of data called cookies to gather web information about users that can be used in targeted advertising. A user can delete a cookie, but lead plaintiff Anthony Henson said Turns zombie cookies evaded detection and could not be deleted. When a person deleted Turns cookies, the company recreated them, he claimed.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Jeffery White granted Turns motion to stay the class action and compel arbitration, finding the claims against Turn were inextricably intertwined with a Verizon customer agreement that includes an arbitration clause.

The plaintiffs had argued Turns motion to compel arbitration should be denied because Turn was not a party to the agreement. But White found arbitration must becompelled when claims arise directly from a provision of a contract that requires arbitration to settle disputes.

The Ninth Circuit disagreed with White Tuesday, findingthe plaintiffs claims arent based on the customer agreement. Instead, their complaint was replete with allegations of wrongdoing against Turn that have nothing to do with the customer agreement, the court wrote, including that Turn collected data about Verizon users without their knowledge and bypassed their phones privacy controls in order to transmit their information to Turn.

None of these allegations rely on the customer agreement or attempt to seek any benefit from its terms, the panel wrote in its 16-page opinion.

Nimish Desai, a partner withLieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein in San Francisco who represents the plaintiffs, said Tuesday that he and his clients were pleased with the decision.

We are looking forward to litigating these claims on behalf of the plaintiffs and the proposed class, he said in an email.

To arrive at its conclusion, the panel relied on the third factor inBauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, decided by the Ninth Circuit in 1977. The factor considers whether a trial courts order is wrong as a matter of law.

The panel found that White had erred by granting Turns motion to compel arbitration under New Yorks equitable estoppel doctrine. Instead, White should have applied the equitable estoppel doctrine of California where Turn was sued to determine whether Turn, as a nonsignatory to the customer agreement, can compel arbitration.

Under California law, Henson would have to arbitrate if his claims relied on the customer agreement, or if the claims were founded in or intertwined with the agreement, according to the Ninth Circuits opinion.

The district court committed clear error by applying New Yorks equitable estoppel doctrine, rather than Californias, and by failing to apply California law correctly, the panel wrote.

The panel found that three of the fiveBaumanfactors weighed in favor of granting the petition.

Michael Rubin of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati in San Franciscorepresents Turn. He could notbe reached for comment Tuesday.

Digital marketing tech company Amobee acquired Turn this past April, according to an announcement on Amobees website. Representatives for Amobee and Verizon did not return requests for comment.

Circuit Judges William Fletcher and Richard Tallman and U.S. District Judge Roslyn Silver, sitting by designation from the District of Arizona, made up the Ninth Circuit panel.

Like Loading…


See the article here:
9th Circuit Revives Class Action Over ‘Zombie’ Smartphone Cookies – Courthouse News Service

Related Post

Reviewed and Recommended by Erik Baquero
This entry was posted in Zombie. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.