Sam Mendess 1917 is a movie so self-consciously overwrought and virtuosic that the only thing you can really do with it is give it an Academy Awardfor Best Cinematography, probably, and also maybe for Best Picture and Best Director. Though, for a lot of viewersand votersthe cinematography in this case is the direction, as the line dividing the camera calisthenics credited to Roger Deakins and Mendess aspirations to realism is as thin as all the digital edits made by (the, yes, Oscar-winning) Lee Smith, which suture together multiple takes into one seamless-seeming whole. As youve probably already heard, 1917s World War I narrative has been designed to play out in the form of a single, extended, endlessly mobile shot, an aesthetic with plenty of conceptual precedents but a newly remarkable means to realize it. More than any other movie released this Oscars cycle, 1917 wears its technical complexity on its sleeve, just like the medals bandied about by the two young British lance corporals who serve as the storys heroesby the you-are-there logic of Mendess setup, the audiences surrogates, scurrying on our behalf through the alternately blasted and bucolic landscape of Northern France.
To say that their quest is eventful is an understatement: If 1917 has an epigram, it would be Ron Burgundys deathless post-street-fight observation, That escalated quickly. Never an austere entertainer, Mendes uses the context of World War I to attempt a necessarily sexless, humorless variation on the Bond franchise he hijacked in Skyfall and Spectre, putting his heroes through a series of kinetic set pieces whose carefully orchestrated authenticity begins to mean less and less as the film goes on. The clichs of the script keep bumping up against the real-time conceit in ways that feel ridiculousi.e., when one of our heroes escapes a firefight, encounters a symbolic mother-and-child in a hidden catacomb, commits an agonizing act of self-defense, and plunges into lethal rapids in the span of about 10 minutes. Comparisons between sitting through 1917 and watching somebody elses video game livestream are apt, not only because of the overcranked action and the thinness of the characterization and dialogueor the way that the cameos by famous British actors serve as veritable save points in the storybut because Mendess mandate of immersion results in a frustratingly passive viewing experience. If you happen to get off on being told, loudly, that a filmmaker is in total control for two hours, 1917 may be for you; if you value films that oblige you to think about what youre watching and why, I might suggest literally anything else in theaters, including, Im guessing, Dolittle.
Whether Mendess work in 1917dedicated to the combat experiences of his grandfatheris accidentally self-aggrandizing is open to debate. Certainly, theres evidence that war movies bring out the inner general in most directors. While Orson Welles called his vocation the biggest electric train set any boy ever had, he could just as easily have compared it to tin tanks and toy soldiers. Its not so much that war is an inherently cinematic subject as that cinema is uniquely suited to its depiction, conjuring up a sound and fury that draws on centuries worth of artistic, literary, and theatrical representations while intensifying them through a technological sophistication thats grown more intricate and overpowering at the same rate as military hardware itself.
If D.W. Griffiths 1915 The Birth of a Nation exists as patient zero of debased American cinema, its important to remember that it is, above all, a war movie, one that attempts to locate a form of moralistic glory in a series of bloody massacres whose wounds were, at the time of its production, 50 years fresher than the conflict depicted in 1917 is today. Racial division may be The Birth of a Nations viciously explicit subject, but combat is its pretense for spectacle, and the films impact as an example of cinemas visual and narrative potential resided primarily in Griffiths ability to choreograph large-scale battle sequences, at once restaging the history of the 19th century and anticipating the gory imagery of much of the 20th.
In an interview in 1973, the great French director Francois Truffaut told Gene Siskel that he didnt think [hed] really seen an anti-war film every film about war ends up being pro-war. Before becoming a filmmaker, Truffaut had shaped his perceptionsand those of an extremely influential generation of readersas a film critic; his comments, while obviously provocative, get at something troubling about the genre. Obviously, Truffaut had, at that point, seen a great many ostensible anti-war films, starting with Lewis Milestones Oscar-winning, paradigm-shifting World War I parable All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)a film that 1917 pays homage toand also including his countryman Jean Renoirs powerful POW drama La Grande Illusion (1937). Hed have understood those movies scripts and sentiments as being angled against war, either in retrospect or contextualized as a preventive gesture (Renoirs plangent plea for pan-European decency was released on the eve of World War II). But Truffauts awareness of the movies effective power led him to believe that simply showing war onscreen was tantamount to a kind of glorification. You can have characters give speeches about the horror and futility of combat, or tug at audiences heartstrings by killing off beloved actors, or deliberately emphasize pain and brutality, but you can never truly drain such material of its basic fascination, so that even the most skillful and poetic attempts to use the medium as a form of protest become weaponized against themselves.
This paradox aligns with the fact that throughout movie history, many of the filmmakers considered most widely to be masters of the form have made war movies, and that regardless of their personal or political agendas in doing so, theyve used the opportunity to flex their muscles. Take, for instance, Stanley Kubrick, whose 1953 debut, Fear and Desire, is, in theory and execution, a war movie that Truffaut might admireone that shies away from showing combat in favor of a psychological approach. Its characters are a platoon of soldiers trapped behind enemy lines in what the opening narration refers to as a country of the mind, suggesting that they are less individuals than archetypes of enlisted men; as the film goes on, they do battle primarily with the enemy within. Equal measures ingenious and pretentious, Fear and Desire hinted at a filmmaker not yet grown into his talent, but by 1957s Paths of Glorya studio-backed World War I epic starring Kirk Douglas as a French colonel defending his men against charges of cowardice from a military establishment determined to execute them as scapegoatshed seized the opportunity to show off his chops.
Paths of Glory is a stylistic landmark in both Kubricks career and the visual vocabulary of war movies, with the prowling tracking shots through the French trenches imparting a simultaneous sense of majesty and detachment: When the villainous General Mireau (George Macready) strolls through the horizontal labyrinth, hes like an imperious god descending to bestow well wishes on his human cannon fodder. What Kubricks balletic setups are satirizing here is a top-down philosophy of warfare in which those closest to the ground are expendable (later in the film, the black-and-white tiles of a courtroom floor resemble the pattern of a chessboard). Paths of Glory is a brilliantly made movie whose antiestablishment politics are unmistakable, but even its phenomenally moving final sequence, in which a German POW sings a folk song and is joined, one by one, by the French soldiers whod previously been jeering her, activates something passionate and stirring within the viewerthe solidarity to head back out and join the fray. (Kubrick revisited and revised the aesthetics of Paths of Glory in Full Metal Jacket, paying himself homage in the indelible scenes of R. Lee Ermeys drill instructor patrolling orderly rows of wannabe Marines at Parris Islandthe trenches transferred to home turfand hilariously parodying his own ending by substituting the Mickey Mouse March for The Faithful Hussar.)
Kubricks style in Paths of Glory was arguably influenced by Alain Resnaiss remarkable 1955 documentary Night and Fog, which juxtaposed agonizing black-and-white footage of Nazi concentration camps with full-color tracking shots of the same locations a decade after their liberation; the movement of the camera in the present-tense sequences is beguiling and purposeful, propelling us past the horror into the future. Night and Fog is not a war movie so much as an essay about the politics of representing it onscreen. In 1960, another key French film critic turned filmmaker, Jacques Rivette, inveighed against a fictional film set in a concentration campGillo Pontecorvos Kapofor using a tracking shot to turn the suicide of a female prisoner (played by Emmanuelle Riva) into a striking image. The man who decides at this moment to make a forward tracking shot to reframe the dead bodycarefully positioning the raised hand in the corner of the final framingis worthy of the most profound contempt, wrote Rivette, disgusted at what he perceived as monstrously manipulative image-making, unethically engaging in a form of morbid showmanship.
Whether or not Pontecorvos film deserves the black-sheep status conferred on it by Rivettes withering review, the comments anticipate something about the films to come in the 1960s, 70s, and beyonda tension between humility and grandiloquence in the face of horror that brought out the best and worst of many directors, sometimes at the same time. The relatively clear-cut morality of the cycle of World War II movies produced in the 1940s and 1950s served to underwrite their entertainment value; while there were thorny, complex films produced then, the default mode of the era was patriotic excitement laced with manful regrets. By contrast, the films made during and about the Vietnam War felt gnarled and twisted against themselves ideologically, although not to the exclusion of stylishness: If theres an aesthetic thread running through The Deer Hunter (1978), Apocalypse Now (1979), and Platoon (1986), its one of shock and awe, of helicopters in flight shot and scored to evoke Valkyries or dispatches from Dantes Inferno.
That so many of a certain crowd ended up trying to make war films speaks to a set of real and irresistible opportunities contained thereinan embedded sense of prestige and power wedded to an obligation for pyrotechnics. In 1979, Steven Spielberg audaciously sent up the World War II combat movies of his moviegoing childhood in 1941, which imagined dogfights over American soil andtellinglyflopped at the box office, coming off as at once too self-indulgent and irreverent to be taken seriously amid a series of probing, ambivalent Vietnam epics. After that, Spielberg played with the genre in the margins of the Indiana Jones series, using Indy to dispatch Nazis away from the battlefields. He waited nearly 20 years to make an official war film in the form of Saving Private Ryanwhich, true to Spielbergs M.O., was made to be the ultimate movie of its kind. Its innovation was to restage D-Day imagery familiar to millions from movies, television shows, and documentaries but punctuated with horror and gore the likes of which had not really been attempted. To see a filmmaker who made his fortune peddling exhilarating escapism suddenly entrap viewers in a relentless, chaotic, multidirectional nightmare was an undeniable show of power, to the point that the film became fully unbalanced: Whatever came next couldnt live up to the overture, and Saving Private Ryan gradually flattens out into something more conventionally affirmative and reassuring, determined to make Spielbergand usfeel like our ordeal was earned and of worth.
In the same year, Terrence Malicknot the anti-Spielberg, perhaps, but surely a 70s auteur who took a different pathcountered Saving Private Ryan with The Thin Red Line, a movie that kept averting its gaze from combat to take in the sights and sensations of the Pacific Theater; the films antiwar philosophy was implicit in its glorious imagery of natures indifference. At the other end of the spectrum, Paul Verhoevens 1997 Starship Troopers strove to beat other alpha-male auteurs at their own game by remaking a stolid, old-fashioned World War II in outer space, substituting giant arachnid monsters for Nazis (beautifully hyperbolizing fear of the Other) and steeping the action in the jingoism of vintage propaganda reels. The films twist ending (parodying nothing less than the weirdly fascistic climax of Star Wars) is that humanity is sort of the bad guy. Here, Verhoeven doesnt wimp out or equivocate about Truffauts dictum but leans into it to an absurd degree, stoking the audiences patriotism and bloodlust through a series of direct-address vignettes that all but recruit us into the conflict. No director has ever had his cake, eaten it, and smeared it all over the screen like Verhoeven, whos long since conquered the country of the mind.
Its telling, perhaps, that the movies associated with the Iraq War have less of an aesthetic legacy than those associated with World War I or II or even Vietnam. In 2005s Jarhead, Mendes even deferred to Francis Ford Coppola by showing Marines watching Apocalypse Now for inspiration, conceding to the older films (and older conflicts) hold on the collective imagination. For the most part, post-9/11 American war movies have been more attuned to politics and aftermath, with spectacle either miniaturizedas in the tense, horror-movie-like bomb-defusing sequences in Kathryn Bigelows The Hurt Lockeror else eliminated altogether. The most formally innovative Iraq War movie, Brian De Palmas Redacted, avoids the battlefield altogether, focusing instead on a panoply of multimedia perspectives to get across themes of division and disinformation; where his 1989 Vietnam film Casualties of War favored a dreamlike, lyrical detachment evincing distance from its subject matter, Redacteds surveillance-style textures and artful integration of documentary material were evidence that the director was trying to speak to the here and now.
So far in the 21st century, no war movie can compete with the fetishistic spectacle of Christopher Nolans Dunkirk, a movie made largely in line with its creators analog aspirations; while there is a fair degree of CGI around the edges of Dunkirks epic, concentric narrative, the directors ambition was to use as many real bodies, vehicles, and physical locations as possible to evoke a much-mythologized turning point in World War II. A decade earlier, Joe Wrights Atonement (2007) used Dunkirk as an excuse to stage one of the most grotesquely ostentatious long takes in recent memory, movie language as floridly overwritten as anything in the novel-within-the-movie. Dunkirk, on the other hand, is not a subtle movie, but its most astonishing imageshundreds of soldiers lying face down on a beach during a bombing run; a fleet of civilian ships bobbing across the wavesare fully integrated as drama instead of feeling styled as virtuoso curlicues. Its also fascinating to contrast Nolans editing-based presentation, which alternately stretches, pauses, and abstracts duration into three different, intersecting timelines, with Mendess one-take, dubiously real-time approach; where Nolan cultivates a sense of urgency and convergence, Mendes contrives a compressed war is hell highlight reel.
Both movies hum with the feeling of clockwork parts locking and sliding into place, but the results are not the same. Dunkirk melds its structural and dramatic satisfactions together into something at once oversize and concise, like an epic poem. Meanwhile, the technocratically picaresque 1917 is the cinematic equivalent of a run-on sentence, one that says very little that we havent heard before. When the camera finally comes to rest, its meant to be impressive that the last shot echoes the first, but its more a matter of redundancy than symmetry. Far from a step forward for the genre, 1917 remains mired in the same artistic no-mans-land that so concerned Francois Truffaut.
Adam Nayman is a film critic, teacher, and author based in Toronto; his book The Coen Brothers: This Book Really Ties the Films Together is available now from Abrams.
See original here:
1917 and the Trouble With War Movies - The Ringer
- 'Immaculate' ending explained: Was the baby a demon? - Business Insider - April 2nd, 2024
- 10 Horror Movies That Would Have Ended Earlier If Their Heroes Were Smarter - CBR - Comic Book Resources - April 2nd, 2024
- Terrifier 3 director reveals they filmed 'most insanely horrific scenes' that nearly made lead actor vomit on set - UNILAD - April 2nd, 2024
- The Latest Stephen King Horror Movie Has A Killer Cast And Director - SlashFilm - April 2nd, 2024
- THE FIRST OMEN 2024: Release Date, Cast, Plot, And Everything You Need to Know - FANGORIA - April 2nd, 2024
- Sting Review | Excellent Creature Feature with an Emotional Backdrop - MovieWeb - April 2nd, 2024
- IMMACULATE Interview with Director Michael Mohan, Discussing the Making of the Film, Reactions to the Ending, and ... - Daily Dead - April 2nd, 2024
- Mood 'Windigo' - Book and Film Globe - April 2nd, 2024
- A 2016 Thriller Is The Top Movie On Netflix Right Now - HuffPost - April 2nd, 2024
- 10 Harsh Realities Of Rewatching Beetlejuice, 36 Years Later - Screen Rant - April 2nd, 2024
- All the Horror Movies We Can't Wait To See in 2024 - The Mary Sue - April 2nd, 2024
- A Buzzy Korean Horror Movie Is Sneakily One Of The Biggest Box Office Hits Of 2024 - SlashFilm - April 2nd, 2024
- Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey 3 horror movie confirmed, after second film debuted to a surprise perfect Rotten ... - Gamesradar - April 2nd, 2024
- Fear Street 4 Is Reviving An Old Horror Trend That Was Perfected 48 Years Ago - Screen Rant - April 2nd, 2024
- Lisa Frankenstein Hides The Fact That It Cast The Real Star Of 2023's Viral $181 Million Horror Movie - Screen Rant - April 2nd, 2024
- Finally, Someone Confirms That A Sequel To HELLRAISER Is In The Works - FANGORIA - April 2nd, 2024
- We're definitely hard at work on: Hellraiser Sequel Promises to Be Even More Terrifying as Producer Vows to Take ... - FandomWire - April 2nd, 2024
- Future Chucky Movie Will Connect To The Series, Says Don Mancini - Screen Rant - April 2nd, 2024
- After Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2, Freddy and Jason Need to Cameo in the Poohniverse - MovieWeb - April 2nd, 2024
- Chucky Creator Reveals He is Working on a New Child's Play Movie: 'Whatever Keeps Me Working' - MovieWeb - April 2nd, 2024
- AI In Late Night With The Devil Sparks Controversy - Forbes - March 24th, 2024
- A horror movie based on a Stephen King novel with a disappointing Rotten Tomatoes score is climbing Netflix's top 10 - Gamesradar - March 24th, 2024
- This is why we're so obsessed with nuns in horror movies - according to the official source, a nun - Gamesradar - March 24th, 2024
- Stephen King reveals the one horror movie he couldn't sit through as he was too scared - UNILAD - March 24th, 2024
- Late Night With the Devil directors address the use of AI art in the film - JoBlo.com - March 24th, 2024
- David Dastmalchian on Late Night with the Devil, The Life of Chuck and Good Fiend Films - Kansas City Pitch - March 24th, 2024
- Welcome to the Poohniverse: Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey Team to Unite Pooh, Bambi, Tinkerbell and More in Low-Budget Horror Crossover (EXCLUSIVE)... - March 24th, 2024
- Late Night with the Devil is the best horror movie of the year so far - Yahoo Movies Canada - March 24th, 2024
- Sydney Sweeney 'wanted to be drenched in blood' in 'Immaculate' - Entertainment Weekly News - March 24th, 2024
- Film of the Week: 'Stopmotion' - The best horror film of 2024 so far - Euronews - March 24th, 2024
- How to Watch Immaculate: Is the Sydney Sweeney Movie Streaming? - TheWrap - March 24th, 2024
- THE FIRST OMEN: A Battle With The Devil And An NC-17 Rating FANGORIA - FANGORIA - March 24th, 2024
- Elevated Horror: The New Wave of Artful Scares Taking Over Hollywood - LRM Online - March 24th, 2024
- Late Night With the Devil Plot Explained: The True Meaning of the Movie - The Direct - March 24th, 2024
- David Chase is directing his first film in 12 years. Its a horror movie. - NJ.com - March 24th, 2024
- Us Was The Box Office Hit That Gave Jordan Peele True Power In Hollywood - SlashFilm - March 24th, 2024
- Cast of 'Gremlins': Catch Up With the Stars of the '80s Hit - First For Women - March 24th, 2024
- 'Immaculate' Review: Sydney Sweeney Is Wide-Eyed but Sly - The New York Times - March 24th, 2024
- Sydney Sweeney explains that bloody 'Immaculate' ending - Entertainment Weekly News - March 24th, 2024
- When Will Sydney Sweeney's Horror Film, 'Immaculate,' Be Available to Stream? - AOL - March 24th, 2024
- Blumhouse to Return Insidious and Other Titles to Theaters for Halfway to Halloween Fest - Hollywood Reporter - March 16th, 2024
- Every Movie In The Wrong Turn Franchise Ranked - SlashFilm - March 16th, 2024
- Blumhouse Celebrating 'Halfway to Halloween' With Five Horror Movies Returning to 100 AMC Movie Theaters - Bloody Disgusting - March 16th, 2024
- DeWanda Wise Sings Creepy Theme Of New Horror Film: 'Imaginary' - The Root - March 16th, 2024
- Hostel: Part II (2007) WTF Happened to This Horror Movie? - JoBlo.com - March 16th, 2024
- New LEPRECHAUN Movie Will Be Funny, Scary And Full Of Practical Effects - FANGORIA - March 16th, 2024
- Blumhouse Celebrating Halfway to Halloween With Five Horror Movies Returning to 100 AMC Movie Theaters - IMDb - March 16th, 2024
- The Horror Nail-Biter On Max With A Controversial Ending - Giant Freakin Robot - March 16th, 2024
- "Says the person who was in Madame Web": Sydney Sweeney is Getting Skewered for Saying Modern Horror Movies ... - FandomWire - March 16th, 2024
- First trailer for horror movie reboot The Crow features an unrecognizable Bill Skarsgrd on a bloody mission of revenge - Gamesradar - March 16th, 2024
- You'll Never Find Me Is Unforgettable Horror, See The Terror In Action - Giant Freakin Robot - March 16th, 2024
- The First Omen star has seen all of your internet theories about the horror movie prequel and, well, they're all wrong - Gamesradar - March 16th, 2024
- Sltface take on horror movies with their new single, 'Final Grl' - Dork Magazine - March 16th, 2024
- From 'Five Nights at Freddy's' to 'Imaginary': Why Blumhouse loves PG-13 horror - theday.com - March 16th, 2024
- The First Omen's Big Death Reveal Really Doesn't Bode Well For The Prequel - Screen Rant - March 16th, 2024
- 20 Scariest Horror Movies to Come Out in the Last 5 Years - MovieWeb - March 16th, 2024
- 'The Animal Kingdom' Exclusive Clip Previews the Gnarly Body Horror of Magnet's New Movie - Bloody Disgusting - March 16th, 2024
- 'Oddity' Review: This Supernatural Horror Film Will Tear You To Pieces | SXSW 2024 - Collider - March 16th, 2024
- "Marketing is failing this movie tremendously": David Dastmalchian's Late Night With the Devil Dubbed as One of the ... - FandomWire - March 16th, 2024
- STOPMOTION is a handcrafted tale of beauty and horror - Moviejawn - March 16th, 2024
- Horror Lovers Will Love this Dining Spot in Texas - klaq.com - March 8th, 2024
- Is Late Night With The Devil Based On A True Story? - Screen Rant - March 8th, 2024
- Kooky King: 6 of the Weirdest Stephen King Film Adaptations - Nightmare on Film Street - March 8th, 2024
- The Unknown, the Viral Willy Wonka Experience Villain, Is Already Getting Their Own Horror Movie - IGN - March 8th, 2024
- 13 Original Horror Movies We Can't Wait to See in 2024 - Screen Rant - March 8th, 2024
- From 'Imaginary' to 'Five Nights at Freddy's.' Why Blumhouse loves PG-13 horror - Los Angeles Times - March 8th, 2024
- Imaginary Movie Review: M3gan Meets The Boogeyman - Mama's Geeky - March 8th, 2024
- Christopher Nolan Originally Conceived Inception As A Horror Movie - SlashFilm - March 8th, 2024
- 'Whalefall' Movie in the Works From 'No One Will Save You' Director Brian Duffield - The Mary Sue - March 8th, 2024
- Horror Movie Based On THE UNKNOWN From Glasgow's WILLY WONKA Experience In The Works Horror Movie ... - CBM (Comic Book Movie) - March 8th, 2024
- Horrifying 'Late Night With The Devil' Trailer Released - Outkick - March 8th, 2024
- Imaginary review: M3GAN, take the wheel - Dexerto - March 8th, 2024
- The Unknown: Horror Movie Based on Unofficial Willy Wonka Experience Is in the Works - ComingSoon.net - March 8th, 2024
- Imaginary Film Review: Light on Frights - Loud And Clear Reviews - March 8th, 2024
- Dead Mail Directors on Their '80s Horror Influences - MovieWeb - March 8th, 2024
- HORROR BEAT: Blumhouse offers a non-update on the future of THE EXORCIST - Comics Beat - March 8th, 2024
- And the Oscar for best picture doesn't go to ... horror! - NPR - March 8th, 2024
- Shaitaan OTT Release: When And Where To Watch R Madhavan And Ajay Devgn Starrer Horror Thriller Film - Indiatimes.com - March 8th, 2024
- The 'Wonka Experience' Is Being Turned Into A Horror Movie - UPROXX - March 8th, 2024
- 8 new horror movies on Netflix, Max, Shudder and more in March 2024 - TechRadar - March 8th, 2024
Reviewed and Recommended by Erik Baquero